Argument from illusion

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Argument from illusion

Quality:

Argument from illusion - argument for the existence of sense-data. Article “Argument from illusion” in English Wikipedia has 16.6 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 4 references and 4 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Argument from illusion”, its content was written by 23 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 48 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 10 times in English Wikipedia and cited 113 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #135163 in June 2008
  • Global: #341428 in June 2008

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #631965 in November 2008
  • Global: #1014939 in February 2010

There are 6 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Argument from illusion
16.5599
2Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
16.2977
3French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
13.61
4Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
8.6764
5Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
7.7575
6Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
0.2788
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Argument from illusion" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Argument from illusion
97 151
2French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
18 528
3Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
14 790
4Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
7 032
5Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
2 781
6Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
1 420
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Argument from illusion" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Argument from illusion
433
2French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
147
3Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
24
4Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
19
5Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
10
6Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
10
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Argument from illusion" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Argument from illusion
23
2Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
9
3French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
6
4Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
5
5Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
3
6Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Argument from illusion" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Argument from illusion
0
2Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
0
3Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
0
4Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
0
5French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
0
6Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Argument from illusion" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1French (fr)
Argument de l'illusion
89
2English (en)
Argument from illusion
10
3Estonian (et)
Illusiooniargument
9
4Spanish (es)
Argumento de ilusión
4
5Portuguese (pt)
Argumento da ilusão
1
6Finnish (fi)
Illuusioargumentti
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
enEnglish
Argument from illusion
esSpanish
Argumento de ilusión
etEstonian
Illusiooniargument
fiFinnish
Illuusioargumentti
frFrench
Argument de l'illusion
ptPortuguese
Argumento da ilusão

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#631965
11.2008
Global:
#1014939
02.2010

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#135163
06.2008
Global:
#341428
06.2008

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 28 January 2026

On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Ajit Pawar, Border 2, Sharad Pawar, Killing of Alex Pretti, Ilhan Omar, Sunetra Pawar, Todd Monken, Kristi Noem, Wonder Man (miniseries), Gregory Bovino.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information